[LAB1]: The basic NOT YET FULLY
OPERATIVE
(slightly updated in June 2003)
Warning: These first five "Search challenges"
are a prototype. Therefore this is'nt yet a full-fledged searching
lab. Omnium rerum principia parva sunt:-)This
here is a "beta version" of what this lab should look like.
Lab1 will open 'officially' only after having
REALLY checked all possible
paths and the relative "pedagogical" value of the challenges... this said, there's no reason you shouldn't already try your own hand at it if
you feel like it... be warned if you want to try this lab, do not read the 'examples of possible solutions' until
you'r done with your own attempts, else you'll spoil your own approach.
[1) mp3]
[2) Text]
[3) Text]
[4) image]
[5) file]
Please note that your Lab-assignement is to find THE MORE POSSIBLE DATA
about each
query target and to describe exactly all steps and paths you have followed.
Use pencil and paper,
you wont regret it... see the tips below.
Aqua Barbie
An [examples of possible solutions]
2) [Text] A very easy introduction to "referenced" text searching & search engines "oddnesses" Main search engines quickfinding
"Ingenium quondam fuerat pretiosius auro,
At nunc barbaria est grandis habere nihil"
An [example of possible solution]
An [advanced essay] by Humphrey P. (February 2001)
3) [Text] Easy introduction to "plagiarism" seeking "The secret of the many words" searching
"The professional industry standard remains Adobe Photoshop (version 5 is now available),
a full-featured image editing application. However, if you work on a PC, you may want to
try Paint Shop Pro, which has some of the same features for a fraction of the cost"
Nota bene: "Plagiarism seeking" is becoming more and more important on the web, as everybody knows. There are
some specific techniques for that, but they basically build on simple 'long strings' queryes
(with all necessary chiasmi alternatives).
As RedHerring found out, there are three other 'plagiarism seeking'
tasks (the easiest one located inside my own
[tools] page). It's
part of a more difficult challenge, though, reserved to those advanced searchers that have
already gone through the first labs.
An [example of possible solution]
4) [Images] Image seeking elementary lores. (Note the filename... :-)
How easy (or difficult) was it to figure out the correct approach?
Was the formulation adequate to help you plan your search?
Which search-approaches and strategies did you choose?
Did you use any "classical" search engine? If so which ones?
Did you use any "special" search engine? If so which ones?
How many results did you retrieve?
What proportion of the results were relevant to your perceived information requirements?
How current were the results? How many 404s?
Was the amount of detail displayed with the results enough to allow you tho evaluate?
Was the order in which the results were displayed evident or apparently illogical?
What other features contribute to (or detract from) the utility of the tools and approaches you choosed?
Did you time your query?
Eh, of course you don't need to answer all the questions above. The purpose of these
labs is to let you understand how important it is to be more "systematic" when searching the web. You may
hop, you may leap, you may be a grasshopper or an ant... the only decisive
factor is the success
of your query and the time you had to employ: you got the targets you were searching for
quickly? You won.